Categories
-Updates-

Our Theory of Social Change

The Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity has unique model which combines faith-based organizing, arts and cultural work, and strategic communication to address, protect and advocate for improvements to the quality of life for the most disenfranchised and vulnerable members of our society.  We carry out our mission through a theory of social change that organizes and unites inter-religious voices with those directly affected, including persons who are low-income, historically-underrepresented, and immigrant to oppose and improve conditions of harsh and inhumane enforcement (incarceration, detention and deportations) and other mistreatment based on status.

Our unique contributions to supporting community-led change are:

  • We strive to break down barriers and build up deep relationships and new understanding between immigrant/new arrivals and U.S.-born citizens through accompaniment, education, cultural immersion, and arts and cultural work.
  • We work to shift narratives and to change hears and minds through strategic communication, public witness, and our “FAITH OUT FRONT” liturgies/ We do this by humanizing immigrant stories and bringing our inter-religious  voices particularly to sectors where they are insufficient or absent, by consistently lifting up root causes and racial equity, and by cultivating “unusual/unlikely” messengers” such as African Americans supporting the immigrant rights movement and corporation leaders advocating racial, social, and economic justice.
  • We build economic, racial and social justice networks by forming partnerships with inter-religious communities and collaborating with enlightened secular individuals and organizations to build power and make valuable contributions to wider change.
  • We believe social change must be rooted in the tenets of inter-religious texts and traditions that respect the integrity of every human person as sacred with the right to thrive and live in strong and healthy communities.
Categories
-Updates-

Race, Gender, Class, Faith and Justice: In Trump’s New America

Join us along with students from the University of Southern California and Loyola Marymount University for a discussion on the issues of Race, Gender, Class, Faith and Justice in this new era under the Trump Administration. Work with us to help relieve some of the fears and concerns generated by the current political climate in our country.

We are focusing on issues that include President Trump’s executive orders, actions, and implied policies. Together, we will search out proactive strategies to determine what we can do in the Greater Los Angeles Area and  on our college campuses.

RSVP here

Categories
-Updates-

Participatory Democracy Now by Rev. Dr. Art Cribbs

Recent conversations with my millennial children caused me to think more deeply about what it means to live in a society that is structured as a Participatory Democracy.  Our talks focus on this year’s presidential election.  Consistent with their generation, they became almost religiously enthralled by the Bernie Sanders’ candidacy.  The irony of their choice captured my attention.  Clearly, he was the eldest in a field of old candidates seeking the highest office in the land.  “Feeling the Bern” and giving enthusiastic support to an avowed Socialist who gave up his New York residency for Vermont also seemed a far cry from my children’s urban upbringing.

Yet, like millions of voters in this election year, my children are mainstream among the flow of people who sincerely desire a change that matters.  Bernie Sanders represents and articulates the important issues on their hearts and minds.

A candidate who did not possess the obvious, visual qualities of a magnet who could attract the millennial vote, Bernie Sanders actually earned their loyalty, confidence, and staunch support right through the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia.  My children did not flee from their choice of the best possible candidate who addressed and met their needs.  Even after Bernie’s race was over and he joined the Democratic Party’s parade, he remained their sole candidate.

The revelation of this electoral process in which the ultimate candidates on the November ballot are not my children’s first or second choice pushed me to look at this Participatory Democracy anew and what it means to voters who are left to make decisions based on the spoils.

In order for a Participatory Democracy to work, residents, citizens, and voters must do much more than cast votes on Election Day.  Yes, you read that right.  “Residents,” “citizens,” and “voters” have to be fully engaged in the democratic process long before entering a polling booth.  Based on recent voting records with very low voter turnouts, more people must get involved in the civic affairs that affect their communities and quality of life.  Even if they are residents without citizenship status, their voices need to be raised and their opinions heard.

People who are citizens must act like citizens by registering and voting.  The process begins long before they vote.  The issues and candidates on the ballot not only should be familiar to the voters, but should appear only after residents, citizens, and voters have determined they deserve the public’s decision.  That is, local people should have a greater say about what measures are worthy of their vote.  Participatory Democracy means the people convene, discuss, decide, and act on issues that originate with them and are critically important to them.

All politics is local and affects the lives of real people in locations where their homes, jobs, schools, religious affiliations, parks, and watering holes are situated.  In order for a real Participatory Democracy to function, the people must insist on taking action from the genesis of the process to its conclusion, including the ballot box.  Participatory Democracy does not take a holiday.  There is no time for people to just sit back and watch what happens.

In fact, in a Participatory Democracy voting is the very least element that drives it forward.  The last thing a person does is vote on Election Day.  Candidates should not be allowed to come around only during campaign time and show up as one of the people.  Instead, there is constant accountability without any ambiguity about who the candidate represents.  The interest of the people who elect politicians is always first and foremost over all other considerations.

My millennial children “felt the Bern” because at least one candidate running for President of the United States of America understood his role and stood above the rest as the one candidate who did not lose sight of what a Participatory Democracy demands: that the voice and the vote of the people matter.